1|       |// This test confirms an earlier problem was resolved, supporting the MIR graph generated by the
    2|       |// structure of this test.
    3|       |
    4|      2|#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
                       ^0            ^0      ^0 ^0  ^1       ^0 ^0^0
    5|       |pub struct Version {
    6|       |    major: usize,
    7|      1|    minor: usize, // Count: 1 - `PartialOrd` compared `minor` values in 3.2.1 vs. 3.3.0
    8|      0|    patch: usize, // Count: 0 - `PartialOrd` was determined by `minor` (2 < 3)
    9|       |}
   10|       |
   11|       |impl Version {
   12|      2|    pub fn new(major: usize, minor: usize, patch: usize) -> Self {
   13|      2|        Self {
   14|      2|            major,
   15|      2|            minor,
   16|      2|            patch,
   17|      2|        }
   18|      2|    }
   19|       |}
   20|       |
   21|      1|fn main() {
   22|      1|    let version_3_2_1 = Version::new(3, 2, 1);
   23|      1|    let version_3_3_0 = Version::new(3, 3, 0);
   24|      1|
   25|      1|    println!("{:?} < {:?} = {}", version_3_2_1, version_3_3_0, version_3_2_1 < version_3_3_0);
   26|      1|}
   27|       |
   28|       |/*
   29|       |
   30|       |This test verifies a bug was fixed that otherwise generated this error:
   31|       |
   32|       |thread 'rustc' panicked at 'No counters provided the source_hash for function:
   33|       |    Instance {
   34|       |        def: Item(WithOptConstParam {
   35|       |            did: DefId(0:101 ~ autocfg[c44a]::version::{impl#2}::partial_cmp),
   36|       |            const_param_did: None
   37|       |        }),
   38|       |        substs: []
   39|       |    }'
   40|       |The `PartialOrd` derived by `Version` happened to generate a MIR that generated coverage
   41|       |without a code region associated with any `Counter`. Code regions were associated with at least
   42|       |one expression, which is allowed, but the `function_source_hash` was only passed to the codegen
   43|       |(coverage mapgen) phase from a `Counter`s code region. A new method was added to pass the
   44|       |`function_source_hash` without a code region, if necessary.
   45|       |
   46|       |*/
   47|       |
   48|       |// FIXME(#79626): The derived traits get coverage, which is great, but some of the traits appear
   49|       |// to get two coverage execution counts at different positions:
   50|       |//
   51|       |// ```text
   52|       |//    4|      2|#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
   53|       |//                       ^0            ^0      ^0 ^0  ^1       ^0 ^0^0
   54|       |// ```text
   55|       |//
   56|       |// `PartialEq`, `PartialOrd`, and `Ord` (and possibly `Eq`, if the trait name was longer than 2
   57|       |// characters) have counts at their first and last characters.
   58|       |//
   59|       |// Why is this? Why does `PartialOrd` have two values (1 and 0)? This must mean we are checking
   60|       |// distinct coverages, so maybe we don't want to eliminate one of them. Should we merge them?
   61|       |// If merged, do we lose some information?